➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author JelleZijlstra
Recipients JelleZijlstra, Sergey.Kirpichev, mark.dickinson, ned.deily, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, tim.peters
Date 2021-04-27.02:49:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1619491755.42.0.655624150893.issue32891@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
Like Mark I'm opposed to this change. It requires little work in CPython itself, but numbers.Integral has now been a part of the language for many years and the name is used in numerous third-party projects. Forcing all of them to change doesn't seem particularly valuable. "Integer" is probably a better name in a vacuum, but "Integral" isn't actively misleading.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-04-27 02:49:15JelleZijlstrasetrecipients: + JelleZijlstra, tim.peters, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, ned.deily, serhiy.storchaka, Sergey.Kirpichev
2021-04-27 02:49:15JelleZijlstrasetmessageid: <1619491755.42.0.655624150893.issue32891@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-04-27 02:49:15JelleZijlstralinkissue32891 messages
2021-04-27 02:49:15JelleZijlstracreate