➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pablogsal
Recipients BTaskaya, Guido.van.Rossum, Mark.Shannon, brandtbucher, freundTech, ncoghlan, pablogsal
Date 2021-04-22.18:46:30
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1619117190.43.0.182442608491.issue43892@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
> I'm not really sure whether we should continue following this old tradition of int? end_* attributes for new sum types like pattern, considering that it was done for supporting the creation of old nodes 3.8< without any change on 3.8>=. pattern subclasses will only be created on 3.10>= so we should be safe by requiring end_* attributes.

Yeah, it will be a requirement very soon actually.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-04-22 18:46:30pablogsalsetrecipients: + pablogsal, ncoghlan, Mark.Shannon, Guido.van.Rossum, brandtbucher, BTaskaya, freundTech
2021-04-22 18:46:30pablogsalsetmessageid: <1619117190.43.0.182442608491.issue43892@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-04-22 18:46:30pablogsallinkissue43892 messages
2021-04-22 18:46:30pablogsalcreate