Message390110
I am closing because 2 of your 3 examples (and many others) have had the messages changed in an effort to be more informative. But Pablo can reverse this if he wants.
In 3.10:
>>> * 2
SyntaxError: can't use starred expression here
+2 and -2 are also valid expressions. /2 is not and still gets the old message.
>>> 2 *
SyntaxError: invalid syntax # Same.
>>> if a=1: pass
SyntaxError: expected ':' # At '=', which *is* an error.
Also not what you you suggested, which points to the impossibility of guessing what the coder meant. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-04-02 22:51:09 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, alonho, pablogsal, BTaskaya |
2021-04-02 22:51:09 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1617403869.82.0.848892453261.issue19080@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-04-02 22:51:09 | terry.reedy | link | issue19080 messages |
2021-04-02 22:51:09 | terry.reedy | create | |
|