This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steve.dower
Recipients Orbital, bugale bugale, corona10, eryksun, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2021-03-17.17:19:44
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1616001584.29.0.970161427354.issue43284@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
CMD is not going to be subjected to compatibility shims that hide the version number, and I *think* those are not inherited by child processes. So it can use the basic APIs. (It's also likely to be the comparison that most people will check against.)

I agree that using WMI is probably overkill. PyWin32 or a new extension module could handle it for people who have a more urgent need.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-03-17 17:19:44steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, paul.moore, tim.golden, zach.ware, eryksun, corona10, bugale bugale, Orbital
2021-03-17 17:19:44steve.dowersetmessageid: <1616001584.29.0.970161427354.issue43284@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-03-17 17:19:44steve.dowerlinkissue43284 messages
2021-03-17 17:19:44steve.dowercreate