Message388922
> I am confused. How can widening the usable number of functions (i.e. using
> the whole C-API rather than the limited API) help c-extension modules be
> usable in subinterpreters? Aren't the same singletons, exception types, and
> other types exposed in the full C-API?
If Py_LIMITED_API is defined then things would stay the same. Otherwise we would replace the names with macros to do the appropriate lookup. (That isn't the whole story since the Py*_Type names are PyTypeObject and not PyObject*.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-03-17 14:40:20 | eric.snow | set | recipients:
+ eric.snow, gvanrossum, nascheme, vstinner, petr.viktorin, Mark.Shannon, mattip |
2021-03-17 14:40:20 | eric.snow | set | messageid: <1615992020.89.0.947811627826.issue43503@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-03-17 14:40:20 | eric.snow | link | issue43503 messages |
2021-03-17 14:40:20 | eric.snow | create | |
|