Author Arfrever
Recipients Arfrever, christian.heimes, ncopa, olivierlefloch, tianon
Date 2021-02-09.19:26:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1612898809.63.0.88045734665.issue43112@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
While original uClibc is not maintained, its fork called uClibc-ng is supposedly binary-compatible with uClibc and is still somehow maintained:
https://uclibc-ng.org/
https://repo.or.cz/w/uclibc-ng.git

https://www.uclibc.org/news.html also says:
"While uClibc releases are on hold, you may use uClibc-ng"

libc part of platform tuple on uClibc-ng systems is expected to be "uclibc".
History
Date User Action Args
2021-02-09 19:26:49Arfreversetrecipients: + Arfrever, christian.heimes, ncopa, tianon, olivierlefloch
2021-02-09 19:26:49Arfreversetmessageid: <1612898809.63.0.88045734665.issue43112@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-02-09 19:26:49Arfreverlinkissue43112 messages
2021-02-09 19:26:49Arfrevercreate