This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vlad2
Recipients iritkatriel, terry.reedy, vlad2
Date 2021-02-02.01:28:38
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CACBtUJ0o+QbCjnaP_PgYcHqsWn8kffQ_E8cN3Mqv5S4K7p1kww@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1612226284.61.0.211320336989.issue43048@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content
Oh, yes, I suppose, that'll truncate to just the first TracebackException.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:38 PM Irit Katriel <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Irit Katriel <iritkatriel@yahoo.com> added the comment:
>
> I meant to catch the exception in the constructor’s recursive call, and if
> necessary then the same again in format (if there are more function calls
> per exception in format, it will be necessary. The unit test from the 3.10
> patch will tell).
>
> Would that not work?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43048>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2021-02-02 01:28:38vlad2setrecipients: + vlad2, terry.reedy, iritkatriel
2021-02-02 01:28:38vlad2linkissue43048 messages
2021-02-02 01:28:38vlad2create