Message385770
I went with Paul's suggestion and added nargs='**' instead of greedy, so at this moment this PR doesn't introduce any changes in any public signatures.
I'm working on 'capture' actions, but I want that to be a separate PR and a separate issue because - first - it may be harder to accept as it is bigger change in both code and documentation and - second - it actually is a separate feature, which could be useful for optional arguments even without nargs='**' implemented.
So, what do you all think about this PR as it now? Docs and tests are updated. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-01-27 13:15:14 | monkeyman79 | set | recipients:
+ monkeyman79, v+python, r.david.murray, paul.j3 |
2021-01-27 13:15:14 | monkeyman79 | set | messageid: <1611753314.8.0.467897739035.issue42973@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-01-27 13:15:14 | monkeyman79 | link | issue42973 messages |
2021-01-27 13:15:14 | monkeyman79 | create | |
|