This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients bhuvaneshbhatt, christian.heimes, eamanu, eric.smith, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano
Date 2021-01-26.10:06:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1611655576.29.0.697682364364.issue43025@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Only yesterday I thought about proposing this idea. I used to think using "i" or "j" was a type of local feature, like using a comma or a period as a decimal separator, or different writing for less-or-equal, but it looks like even in the English-speaking world mathematics use "i", and "j" is only used by electric engineers.

Possible argument against the "i" suffix is that its capital form "I" can be confused with the "l" suffix for longs (but it is no longer applicable in Python 3) and digit "1". Although there is more similarity between "l" and "1" them between them both and "I", and there are other pairs of potentially confusing characters: "O" (for octals) and "0", "B" (for binaries) and "8".
History
Date User Action Args
2021-01-26 10:06:16serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, christian.heimes, steven.daprano, eamanu, bhuvaneshbhatt
2021-01-26 10:06:16serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1611655576.29.0.697682364364.issue43025@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-01-26 10:06:16serhiy.storchakalinkissue43025 messages
2021-01-26 10:06:16serhiy.storchakacreate