Message385648
Even if we wanted to switch to "i" we'd have to continue to also support "j": there's a ton of existing code that uses it. Since "j" is used by some fields (including my own) for the imaginary part of complex numbers, and since I don't think we want to have two ways to do the same thing, I think this proposal should be objected.
But if you really want to pursue it, I suggest starting a discussion on the python-ideas mailing list. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2021-01-25 19:17:55 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, christian.heimes, bhuvaneshbhatt |
2021-01-25 19:17:55 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1611602275.11.0.688193168809.issue43025@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2021-01-25 19:17:55 | eric.smith | link | issue43025 messages |
2021-01-25 19:17:55 | eric.smith | create | |
|