➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Frederik Rietdijk
Recipients Alexandru Ardelean, Frederik Rietdijk, Ray Donnelly, barry, benjamin.peterson, bmwiedemann, brett.cannon, dstufft, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eschwartz, jefferyto, mcepl, methane, miss-islington, sascha_silbe, vstinner
Date 2020-12-30.13:08:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1609333727.85.0.60854765511.issue29708@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
Building Python packages reproducibly has now basically been resolved with the reproducible bytecode as well as changes in tools such as pip.

Unfortunately, the interpreters do not yet seem to be reproducible. After certain changes, a Nixpkgs build of 3.9 shows several tiny bytecode differences. What could have caused these differences? Please see the attached diffoscope report. 

As part of installation all bytecode is force regenerated using compileall. This is using the default checked-hash.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-12-30 13:08:47Frederik Rietdijksetrecipients: + Frederik Rietdijk, barry, brett.cannon, vstinner, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, mcepl, eric.araujo, sascha_silbe, methane, dstufft, bmwiedemann, Alexandru Ardelean, Ray Donnelly, eschwartz, miss-islington, jefferyto
2020-12-30 13:08:47Frederik Rietdijksetmessageid: <1609333727.85.0.60854765511.issue29708@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-12-30 13:08:47Frederik Rietdijklinkissue29708 messages
2020-12-30 13:08:47Frederik Rietdijkcreate