Message 383513 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	samuelmarks
Recipients	eric.smith, josh.r, kj, rhettinger, samuelmarks, steven.daprano
Date	2020-12-21.11:51:02
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1608551462.23.0.982786602704.issue42699@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
I suppose that's a good justification to never improve/upgrade the syntax and quality of the codebase. In terms of automatic upgrades of the codebase, one could always replicate the approach I use in doctrans—i.e., use of `ast` and/or `inspect`—to automatically upgrade syntax from `%` and `.format` to use f-strings. Would that be acceptable?

I suppose that's a good justification to never improve/upgrade the syntax and quality of the codebase.

In terms of automatic upgrades of the codebase, one could always replicate the approach I use in doctrans—i.e., use of `ast` and/or `inspect`—to automatically upgrade syntax from `%` and `.format` to use f-strings.

Would that be acceptable?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-12-21 11:51:02	samuelmarks	set	recipients: + samuelmarks, rhettinger, eric.smith, steven.daprano, josh.r, kj
2020-12-21 11:51:02	samuelmarks	set	messageid: <1608551462.23.0.982786602704.issue42699@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-12-21 11:51:02	samuelmarks	link	issue42699 messages
2020-12-21 11:51:02	samuelmarks	create