This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author BTaskaya
Recipients BTaskaya, Mark.Shannon, christian.heimes, josh.r, mark.dickinson, pablogsal, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date 2020-11-30.19:16:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1606763787.81.0.274424958297.issue42454@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> I have to say that I feel that this will complicate things too much. Part of the appeal of this change is how straightforward and maintainable is. Fiddling with code objects lowers the watermark.

Agreed. And I'd go for either making slices hashable as is, or rejecting this patch without implementing more hacks to the Python / messing with the compiler.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-11-30 19:16:27BTaskayasetrecipients: + BTaskaya, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, christian.heimes, Mark.Shannon, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r, pablogsal
2020-11-30 19:16:27BTaskayasetmessageid: <1606763787.81.0.274424958297.issue42454@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-11-30 19:16:27BTaskayalinkissue42454 messages
2020-11-30 19:16:27BTaskayacreate