Message379725
I believe the documentation may be referring to the English set and not a Python set, but I could be wrong.
Yury changed the wording from sequence to set in 3.7, but we didn't document a breaking change as far as I know. The purpose of those set constructions was to handle the many things other than a set that can be passed in that may have non-unique values. Early asyncio documentation included examples of passing wait() a list.
I wouldn't be surprised if there are other libraries or apps out there for which removing iterator support was an accidentally-breaking change and it may be strange if this is only is broken in 3.9.x, but working both before and after. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-10-27 03:24:53 | JustinTArthur | set | recipients:
+ JustinTArthur, ods, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, yselivanov, dutradda |
2020-10-27 03:24:53 | JustinTArthur | set | messageid: <1603769093.58.0.319108646796.issue42140@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-10-27 03:24:53 | JustinTArthur | link | issue42140 messages |
2020-10-27 03:24:53 | JustinTArthur | create | |
|