Author JustinTArthur
Recipients JustinTArthur, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, dutradda, ods, yselivanov
Date 2020-10-27.03:24:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1603769093.58.0.319108646796.issue42140@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
I believe the documentation may be referring to the English set and not a Python set, but I could be wrong.

Yury changed the wording from sequence to set in 3.7, but we didn't document a breaking change as far as I know. The purpose of those set constructions was to handle the many things other than a set that can be passed in that may have non-unique values. Early asyncio documentation included examples of passing wait() a list.

I wouldn't be surprised if there are other libraries or apps out there for which removing iterator support was an accidentally-breaking change and it may be strange if this is only is broken in 3.9.x, but working both before and after.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-10-27 03:24:53JustinTArthursetrecipients: + JustinTArthur, ods, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, yselivanov, dutradda
2020-10-27 03:24:53JustinTArthursetmessageid: <1603769093.58.0.319108646796.issue42140@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-10-27 03:24:53JustinTArthurlinkissue42140 messages
2020-10-27 03:24:53JustinTArthurcreate