Author pradyunsg
Recipients Marcus.Smith, brett.cannon, dstufft, eric.araujo, eric.snow, jaraco, lkollar, lukasz.langa, ncoghlan, pablogsal, paul.moore, pradyunsg, steve.dower, vstinner
Date 2020-10-03.12:31:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAPA-EqsnftEO=QjHxiqJYw-=vho3Xo+MtOoRcZ4mCJkx6L2aqw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1601649766.64.0.74479063775.issue41490@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content
+1 for bumping to 20.2.3, in case an upstream voice is helpful. :)

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:12 PM Pablo Galindo Salgado <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablogsal@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> I think that the backport to 3.8 may have some unintended consequences in
> the last patch release as venv created with 3.8 now exhibit the pip
> regression (https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/8695.).
>
> Steve, would you be ok if we bump all branches (master, 3.9 and 3.8) to
> 20.2.3?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +pablogsal
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41490>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2020-10-03 12:31:05pradyunsgsetrecipients: + pradyunsg, brett.cannon, paul.moore, jaraco, ncoghlan, vstinner, eric.araujo, lukasz.langa, eric.snow, steve.dower, dstufft, Marcus.Smith, lkollar, pablogsal
2020-10-03 12:31:05pradyunsglinkissue41490 messages
2020-10-03 12:31:05pradyunsgcreate