This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tadeu
Recipients tadeu
Date 2020-09-13.13:23:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1600003428.26.0.120292470084.issue41777@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Here is the inconsistent behavior, when running with `python -bb` (or just `python -b`), caused by an internal cache:

    >>> import struct
    >>> struct.calcsize(b'!d')  # cache for '!d' uses bytes
    8
    >>> struct.calcsize('!d')  # so there's a warning when trying to use str
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    BytesWarning: Comparison between bytes and string
    >>> struct.calcsize('>d')  # cache for '>d' uses str
    8
    >>> struct.calcsize(b'>d')  # so now the warning is inverted, it shows up when trying to use bytes
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    BytesWarning: Comparison between bytes and string
    >>> struct.calcsize('>d')  # no problem when using str
    8

Note that this might be caused by a possible larger problem when dealing with keys of different string types in dicts under `python -b` (or `python -bb`):

    $ python
    Python 3.8.5 (tags/v3.8.5:580fbb0, Jul 20 2020, 15:57:54) [MSC v.1924 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
    Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
    >>> d={}
    >>> d['a']=1
    >>> d[b'a']=2
    >>> d['a']
    1
    >>> d[b'a']
    2


    $ python -bb
    Python 3.8.5 (tags/v3.8.5:580fbb0, Jul 20 2020, 15:57:54) [MSC v.1924 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
    Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
    >>> d={}
    >>> d['a']=1
    >>> d[b'a']=2
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>

I'm not sure if this warning is intentional, since in Python 3 there seems to be no special reason for dicts to try to compare 'a' with b'a' (other than possible implementation details).


Note: this is from an issue found here: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-xdist/issues/596
History
Date User Action Args
2020-09-13 13:23:48tadeusetrecipients: + tadeu
2020-09-13 13:23:48tadeusetmessageid: <1600003428.26.0.120292470084.issue41777@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-09-13 13:23:48tadeulinkissue41777 messages
2020-09-13 13:23:47tadeucreate