This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author epaine
Recipients epaine, terry.reedy, wyz23x2
Date 2020-08-03.09:39:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1596447594.94.0.807620661351.issue41075@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> but not with binding to modifier-up/down.

I cannot reproduce. I have tested on both Windows and Linux and found I could successfully change to (and use) the modifier-up/down bindings both through the Keys page of the configdialog and by editing the keys def. There was no traceback on either platform. @wyz23x2, can you reproduce this problem?

My personal preference for the new bindings, when tested, was alt-up/down as it is most similar to the existing bindings. Also, control-up/down is used in other apps for moving the cursor multiple lines at a time and shift-up/down (at least in my mind) seems like a weird/random choice. Terry, I don't know what you have in mind, but I think these bindings should be in addition to the existing ones rather than instead of (I also tested this and found it to work correctly).
History
Date User Action Args
2020-08-03 09:39:55epainesetrecipients: + epaine, terry.reedy, wyz23x2
2020-08-03 09:39:54epainesetmessageid: <1596447594.94.0.807620661351.issue41075@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-08-03 09:39:54epainelinkissue41075 messages
2020-08-03 09:39:54epainecreate