This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tontinton
Recipients tontinton
Date 2020-07-08.19:00:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1594234814.85.0.697243284436.issue41247@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
There is a cache variable for the running loop holder, but once set_running_loop is called the variable was set to NULL so the next time get_running_loop would have to query a dictionary to receive the running loop holder.

I thought why not always cache the latest set_running_loop?

The only issue I thought of here is in the details of the implementation: I have too little experience in python to know if there could be a context switch to get_running_loop while set_running_loop is running.

If a context switch is possible there then this issue would be way harder to solve, but it is still solvable.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-07-08 19:00:14tontintonsetrecipients: + tontinton
2020-07-08 19:00:14tontintonsetmessageid: <1594234814.85.0.697243284436.issue41247@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-07-08 19:00:14tontintonlinkissue41247 messages
2020-07-08 19:00:14tontintoncreate