➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author skrah
Recipients lukasz.langa, petr.viktorin, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner
Date 2020-07-07.18:20:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1594146011.67.0.0886765205895.issue39542@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
A brief note for Victor that *nothing* was directed against him. On
the contrary, msg372995 was supporting him in case the commit had
actually been unreviewed, which it apparently wasn't. Sorry for
jumping on the bandwagon there.


> PEP 620 for the overall plan.

This one I have some trouble with.  It cites PyPy as a bottleneck, but
IIRC Armin Rigo was on record saying that such changes would not help
PyPy, and he would come up with a counter proposal. Has this changed?

It is also a bit unusual that the PEP is in draft status but a lot
of things are already committed.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-07-07 18:20:11skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, petr.viktorin, lukasz.langa, serhiy.storchaka
2020-07-07 18:20:11skrahsetmessageid: <1594146011.67.0.0886765205895.issue39542@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-07-07 18:20:11skrahlinkissue39542 messages
2020-07-07 18:20:11skrahcreate