Message372609
Łukasz: what would you recommend for downstream packagers?
I have essentially two options (assuming this isn't reverted in cpython master which I believe makes the most sense since cpython still works fine with older libmpdec):
- revert this individual commit as a patch
- fork further from debian's packaging and use the vendored libmpdec (this potentially carries other negative side-effects since it makes the packages unlike upstream's -- and potentially susceptible to vendor/security drift since we don't carry patches for vendored components (but would get them from system libmpdec))
I'd rather not carry that patch indefinitely if possible -- especially when this cannot be built in a compatible way on software that's a mere 2 months old (ubuntu 20.04). For similar libraries (ssl, ffi, etc.) this would be a very major break in building. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-06-29 18:00:36 | Anthony Sottile | set | recipients:
+ Anthony Sottile, doko, christian.heimes, skrah, lukasz.langa, miss-islington |
2020-06-29 18:00:36 | Anthony Sottile | set | messageid: <1593453636.41.0.140321168293.issue40874@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-06-29 18:00:36 | Anthony Sottile | link | issue40874 messages |
2020-06-29 18:00:36 | Anthony Sottile | create | |
|