This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author izbyshev
Recipients Yonatan Goldschmidt, gregory.p.smith, izbyshev, koobs, pablogsal, ronaldoussoren
Date 2020-06-26.15:48:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
I'd really like to get this merged eventually because vfork()-based solution is fundamentally more generic than posix_spawn(). Apart from having no issue with close_fds=True, it will also continue to allow subprocess to add any process context tweaks without waiting for availability of corresponding features in posix_spawn().

If there is no objection from Gregory or other devs, I can pick up from where I left in two weeks.
Date User Action Args
2020-06-26 15:48:04izbyshevsetrecipients: + izbyshev, gregory.p.smith, ronaldoussoren, koobs, pablogsal, Yonatan Goldschmidt
2020-06-26 15:48:04izbyshevsetmessageid: <>
2020-06-26 15:48:04izbyshevlinkissue35823 messages
2020-06-26 15:48:04izbyshevcreate