➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steven.daprano
Recipients jaraco, lemburg, steven.daprano
Date 2020-05-09.22:27:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1589063231.81.0.128505464405.issue40578@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
You have given no justification for removing item access for the fields except "some users are still relying on ... access by item position and length". Normally the fact that some people are doing this would be reason to reject this backwards-compatibility breaking change. Why is it a problem that people are using something which is documented as a tuple as a tuple?
History
Date User Action Args
2020-05-09 22:27:11steven.dapranosetrecipients: + steven.daprano, lemburg, jaraco
2020-05-09 22:27:11steven.dapranosetmessageid: <1589063231.81.0.128505464405.issue40578@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-05-09 22:27:11steven.dapranolinkissue40578 messages
2020-05-09 22:27:11steven.dapranocreate