Message367903
graingert: Do you have a workaround for this? I'm doing roughly the same thing with an asyncpg connection pool nested with a transaction and am getting nowhere.
async with pg_pool.acquire() as conn:
async with conn.transaction():
... |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-05-02 00:13:33 | brian.curtin | set | recipients:
+ brian.curtin, asvetlov, yselivanov, graingert, lisroach, xtreak |
2020-05-02 00:13:33 | brian.curtin | set | messageid: <1588378413.64.0.948593803119.issue40406@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-05-02 00:13:33 | brian.curtin | link | issue40406 messages |
2020-05-02 00:13:33 | brian.curtin | create | |
|