Message367203
Mark, you don't count ;-) Neither do I. Of course I've subclassed Random too, to experiment with other base generators (including PCG variants). But they're throwaways, and I don't care that it can require staring at the code to make as many changes as needed. Developers _of_ Python don't need things to be trivial to make quick progress.
So I remain where I was: +0, provided there are no notable runtime regressions. Nice to have (hence "+"), but don't really care if it never happens (hence "0").
As to what numpy does, I'm always in favor of following their lead when possible and Pythonic. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-04-24 17:13:24 | tim.peters | set | recipients:
+ tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka |
2020-04-24 17:13:24 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1587748404.87.0.11112973286.issue40346@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-04-24 17:13:24 | tim.peters | link | issue40346 messages |
2020-04-24 17:13:23 | tim.peters | create | |
|