This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2020-04-24.17:08:57
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1587748138.02.0.0704011714355.issue40346@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
[Victor]

> Honestly, if you consider that BaseRandom base class is not worth it, I will just abandon this idea.

It's not that I think it's not worth it (I'm not currently convinced either way). It's more that if we're going to make a change, then it's not clear to me that the particular choice in the BaseRandom PR is necessarily the only or best way to do it. There are a good few technical choices to be made, and I think there's value in having a wider discussion.
History
Date User Action Args
2020-04-24 17:08:58mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka
2020-04-24 17:08:58mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1587748138.02.0.0704011714355.issue40346@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-04-24 17:08:58mark.dickinsonlinkissue40346 messages
2020-04-24 17:08:57mark.dickinsoncreate