This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author maggyero
Recipients maggyero, rhettinger
Date 2020-03-08.14:44:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1583678660.3.0.460032904848.issue39862@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Thanks for the reference @Raymond. I could not find any mention of the union relationships for ≤ and ≥ though. Since they are always valid for Boolean values, in the same way that ≠ is always the complement of = for Boolean values and default implemented as such in the interpreter, what do you think of default implementing these union relationships in the interpreter?
History
Date User Action Args
2020-03-08 14:44:20maggyerosetrecipients: + maggyero, rhettinger
2020-03-08 14:44:20maggyerosetmessageid: <1583678660.3.0.460032904848.issue39862@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-03-08 14:44:20maggyerolinkissue39862 messages
2020-03-08 14:44:20maggyerocreate