Author Elad Lahav
Recipients Elad Lahav, dstufft, eric.araujo, gvanrossum, p-ganssle, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2020-02-26.20:10:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
I'm not convinced that a multi-threaded fork()+exec() from C would be any better, unless the Python code goes to great lengths to avoid any non-async-signal-safe operations between the fork() and the exec().
So along with the proposed change to switch to the subprocess() module I would like to propose that that module switch to using posix_spawn() instead of fork()+exec().
Date User Action Args
2020-02-26 20:10:06Elad Lahavsetrecipients: + Elad Lahav, gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, eric.araujo, dstufft, p-ganssle
2020-02-26 20:10:06Elad Lahavsetmessageid: <>
2020-02-26 20:10:06Elad Lahavlinkissue39763 messages
2020-02-26 20:10:06Elad Lahavcreate