Message362694
I consider a free type for the default as an implementation detail, not the encouraged approach.
Since the value is always a string, using the same type for the default sounds like a sane design for me. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2020-02-26 15:06:39 | asvetlov | set | recipients:
+ asvetlov, docs@python, remi.lapeyre, dorosch |
2020-02-26 15:06:39 | asvetlov | set | messageid: <1582729599.18.0.432594312096.issue39759@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2020-02-26 15:06:39 | asvetlov | link | issue39759 messages |
2020-02-26 15:06:39 | asvetlov | create | |
|