Message 362248 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	aeros
Recipients	LewisGaul, aeros, b1tninja, beccamorgan
Date	2020-02-19.04:46:34
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1582087594.59.0.207986199492.issue38860@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Justin Capella wrote: > Is there a better forum for discussion about design/behavior, maybe the more generic issue of GenericPyCData_new using tp_alloc instead of tp_new Rebecca Morgan wrote: > I would still be interested in this, with some clarity on the testing/expected behavior. I'm not personally active on the capi-sig mailing list, but it seems like it would be a suitable location for discussing the behavior of GenericPyCData_new. If you don't receive a response in capi-sig, you could also try python-dev to bring some attention to the issue since most of the core developers actively check there.

Justin Capella wrote:
> Is there a better forum for discussion about design/behavior, maybe the more generic issue of GenericPyCData_new using tp_alloc instead of tp_new

Rebecca Morgan wrote:
> I would still be interested in this, with some clarity on the testing/expected behavior.

I'm not personally active on the capi-sig mailing list, but it seems like it would be a suitable location for discussing the behavior of GenericPyCData_new. If you don't receive a response in capi-sig, you could also try python-dev to bring some attention to the issue since most of the core developers actively check there.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-02-19 04:46:34	aeros	set	recipients: + aeros, LewisGaul, beccamorgan, b1tninja
2020-02-19 04:46:34	aeros	set	messageid: <1582087594.59.0.207986199492.issue38860@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-02-19 04:46:34	aeros	link	issue38860 messages
2020-02-19 04:46:34	aeros	create