➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pablogsal
Recipients belopolsky, christian.heimes, eric.smith, gdr@garethrees.org, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, orsenthil, pablogsal, remi.lapeyre, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tim.peters, tshepang
Date 2020-01-17.00:07:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1579219667.46.0.989070006065.issue17005@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
I have been playing with the API for a while and I have to say that I have fallen in love with it: I tried to reimplement many snippets of parallel and non-parallel topological-order processing of a graph with this and it always fits very nicely.

I have shown this API also to some library maintainers that have to deal with topological sorting (like the tox maintainer) and they are very enthusiastic about the API as well.

Tim, I have updated PR 11583 to use the proposed API with test and docs. Could you make a review when you have some time so we can polish it for the 3.9 release?
History
Date User Action Args
2020-01-17 00:07:47pablogsalsetrecipients: + pablogsal, tim.peters, rhettinger, terry.reedy, belopolsky, orsenthil, eric.smith, christian.heimes, lukasz.langa, tshepang, gdr@garethrees.org, martin.panter, remi.lapeyre
2020-01-17 00:07:47pablogsalsetmessageid: <1579219667.46.0.989070006065.issue17005@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-01-17 00:07:47pablogsallinkissue17005 messages
2020-01-17 00:07:47pablogsalcreate