Message358128
I am not sure that if co_filename can break backwards compability or not (because until CodeType.replace; it was usual to break code object construction, people who are using code objects may take this too) but yes PR 17534 was necessary.
My initial patch (PR 13527) proposed a future directive to do this (and poorly implemented the concept) which can be helpful (yet it needs a PEP). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-12-09 18:57:38 | BTaskaya | set | recipients:
+ BTaskaya, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, vstinner, r.david.murray, lukasz.langa, Michel Desmoulin, ammar2, xtreak |
2019-12-09 18:57:38 | BTaskaya | set | messageid: <1575917858.07.0.227695677048.issue20443@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-12-09 18:57:38 | BTaskaya | link | issue20443 messages |
2019-12-09 18:57:37 | BTaskaya | create | |
|