Message 357166 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	asvetlov
Recipients	asvetlov, esrse, josh.r, yselivanov
Date	2019-11-21.13:00:10
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1574341210.76.0.165521200417.issue38874@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
I still don't understand the problem. If the queue is full new items still are added in the order of `await q.put()` calls. If there are multiple producers the order of adding items into the queue is still the order of `q.put()`. Do you have a code example that demonstrates the opposite behavior?

I still don't understand the problem.
If the queue is full new items still are added in the order of `await q.put()` calls.
If there are multiple producers the order of adding items into the queue is still the order of `q.put()`.

Do you have a code example that demonstrates the opposite behavior?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-11-21 13:00:10	asvetlov	set	recipients: + asvetlov, yselivanov, josh.r, esrse
2019-11-21 13:00:10	asvetlov	set	messageid: <1574341210.76.0.165521200417.issue38874@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-11-21 13:00:10	asvetlov	link	issue38874 messages
2019-11-21 13:00:10	asvetlov	create