Author brett.cannon
Recipients Mark.Shannon, brett.cannon, dino.viehland, eric.snow, fabioz, vstinner
Date 2019-11-12.19:38:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1573587527.5.0.712528005259.issue38500@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
I would like to bring this issue back on topic as this about how to expose PEP 523 support in Python 3.8, not whether Fabio should be using a different approach when he has been something sanctioned in an accepted PEP and was previously doable that was (accidentally) taken away from him.

If people want to do a separate PEP to roll back PEP 523 that's fine, but until that occurs I think we should move forward with the fact that PEP 523 is active.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-11-12 19:38:47brett.cannonsetrecipients: + brett.cannon, vstinner, fabioz, dino.viehland, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow
2019-11-12 19:38:47brett.cannonsetmessageid: <1573587527.5.0.712528005259.issue38500@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-11-12 19:38:47brett.cannonlinkissue38500 messages
2019-11-12 19:38:47brett.cannoncreate