This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author LewisGaul
Recipients Gareth.Gouldstone, LewisGaul, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, r.david.murray, twouters
Date 2019-10-27.14:26:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1572186362.88.0.956391379861.issue21002@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Scanner is not documented in CPython's own re documentation: https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html#regular-expression-objects, so I'd say there's no obligation to maintain consistency with public APIs.

Is anyone able to make a call on whether this issue should be closed, or alternatively give some guidance on what work this issue should encompass?
History
Date User Action Args
2019-10-27 14:26:02LewisGaulsetrecipients: + LewisGaul, twouters, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, r.david.murray, Gareth.Gouldstone
2019-10-27 14:26:02LewisGaulsetmessageid: <1572186362.88.0.956391379861.issue21002@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-10-27 14:26:02LewisGaullinkissue21002 messages
2019-10-27 14:26:02LewisGaulcreate