This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author corona10
Recipients corona10, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2019-10-18.12:16:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1571401010.28.0.97674716503.issue38513@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> How official is that?

https://github.com/jythontools/jython
jeff5 is now maintaining Jython2 but I can not find Jython3 under development.

> Does it cost any maintenance burden? If not, you have your answer :-)

Yes, it currently not burdens for maintenance.
But is the policy of CPython to care about alternative interpreter implementation? So if the new alternative implementation request to modify CPython code. Is it okay?
If so I agree with not to remove Jython code on Python3.x

But if not, can we gradually remove about alternative interpreter related code? Should we preserve the area for Jython?
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Doc/using/cmdline.rst#options-you-shouldnt-use

Okay, I understand that there must be a historical reason for those codes. But can we move a step for deprecating them?
History
Date User Action Args
2019-10-18 12:16:50corona10setrecipients: + corona10, vstinner, serhiy.storchaka
2019-10-18 12:16:50corona10setmessageid: <1571401010.28.0.97674716503.issue38513@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-10-18 12:16:50corona10linkissue38513 messages
2019-10-18 12:16:49corona10create