Message354331
> We should not provide such an "run arbitrary python code before execing the ultimate child" feature in the standard library.
Do you want to modify _posixsubprocess to call umask() between fork() and exec()? As it has been done for uid, gid and groups: call setreuid(), setregid() and setgroups()?
If so, it means that posix_spawn() couldn't be used when the new umask parameter would be used, right? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-10-10 08:00:58 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, gregory.p.smith, christian.heimes |
2019-10-10 08:00:58 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1570694458.06.0.497019293333.issue38417@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-10-10 08:00:58 | vstinner | link | issue38417 messages |
2019-10-10 08:00:57 | vstinner | create | |
|