While people are thinking about gc, zleak.py shows a small bug, and a possible opportunity for improvement, in the way gc treats finalizers that resurrect objects.

The bug:  the stats keep claiming gc is collecting an enormous number of objects, but in fact it's not collecting any.  Objects in the unreachable set shouldn't add to the "collected" count unless they _are_ collected.

Output:

resurrecting
collect 2000002
gen 2 stats {'collections': 2, 'collected': 2000002, 'uncollectable': 0}
resurrecting
collect 4000004
gen 2 stats {'collections': 3, 'collected': 6000006, 'uncollectable': 0}
resurrecting
collect 6000006
gen 2 stats {'collections': 4, 'collected': 12000012, 'uncollectable': 0}
resurrecting
collect 8000008
gen 2 stats {'collections': 5, 'collected': 20000020, 'uncollectable': 0}
resurrecting
collect 10000010
gen 2 stats {'collections': 6, 'collected': 30000030, 'uncollectable': 0}
...

Memory use grows without bound, and collections take ever longer.

The opportunity:  if any finalizer resurrects anything, gc gives up.  But the process of computing whether anything was resurrected also determines which initially-trash objects are reachable from the risen dead.  Offhand I don't see why we couldn't proceed collecting what remains trash.  Then zleak.py would reclaim everything instead of nothing.

Sketch:  rather than just set a flag, check_garbage() could move now-reachable objects to the old generation (and, for each one moved, decrement the count of collected objects).  Then delete_garbage() could proceed on what remains in the unreachable list.