➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gregory.p.smith
Recipients ammar2, benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, jaraco, larry, lukasz.langa, mcepl, ned.deily, tburke, webknjaz, xtreak
Date 2019-09-27.05:32:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1569562346.06.0.613529633222.issue38216@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content 
Regardless, since things have already shipped in stable releases, there is a release that code _will_ encounter somewhere that does validate data but does not support overruling that behavior.  so i'm not sure if it actually matters to have this in 3.7 or 3.6 as anyone who wants to avoid complaints from users who happen to be on those python patch levels will need to include a workaround in their code or explicitly avoid those versions.

That said, PR 16321 looks overall like a good idea, I have no problem with it being backported to 3.7 and 3.6.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-09-27 05:32:26gregory.p.smithsetrecipients: + gregory.p.smith, jaraco, larry, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, mcepl, lukasz.langa, webknjaz, ammar2, tburke, xtreak
2019-09-27 05:32:26gregory.p.smithsetmessageid: <1569562346.06.0.613529633222.issue38216@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-09-27 05:32:26gregory.p.smithlinkissue38216 messages
2019-09-27 05:32:25gregory.p.smithcreate