This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients eryksun, jeremy.kloth, jkloth, nanjekyejoannah, vstinner
Date 2019-08-22.22:12:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1566511956.69.0.416637676571.issue37531@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> This is an issue when the standard handles are inherited or duplicated to a grandchild process, and so on. In the case of Popen(sys.executable), the system is duplicating the standard handles implicitly because sys.executable is a console process (assuming it's python[_d].exe), among other criteria. An additional reference on the write side prevents the pipe from closing. fh.read() in the grandparent won't return as long as there's a writer that could potentially write more data.

Is there a way to workaround that?
History
Date User Action Args
2019-08-22 22:12:36vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, jkloth, jeremy.kloth, eryksun, nanjekyejoannah
2019-08-22 22:12:36vstinnersetmessageid: <1566511956.69.0.416637676571.issue37531@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-08-22 22:12:36vstinnerlinkissue37531 messages
2019-08-22 22:12:36vstinnercreate