Author nanjekyejoannah
Recipients nanjekyejoannah
Date 2019-08-19.19:05:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1566241522.51.0.41054137805.issue37888@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
In the documentation for Py_NewInterpreter(): It is said that :

The return value points to the first thread state created in the new sub-interpreter.  This thread state is made in the current thread state.

I think changing :

This thread state is made in the current thread state.

To:

This thread state is made the current thread state.

Sounds good. Since a call such as:

substate = Py_NewInterpreter()

makes *substate* the current state. no?

The *in* takes me in a different direction of thought.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-08-19 19:05:22nanjekyejoannahsetrecipients: + nanjekyejoannah
2019-08-19 19:05:22nanjekyejoannahsetmessageid: <1566241522.51.0.41054137805.issue37888@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-08-19 19:05:22nanjekyejoannahlinkissue37888 messages
2019-08-19 19:05:21nanjekyejoannahcreate