Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients Greg Price, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, lemburg, miss-islington, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2019-08-15.01:24:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <83df210e-df05-4894-b3c4-c53d67bb6639@www.fastmail.com>
In-reply-to <1565778336.83.0.280142443658.issue37760@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 03:25, STINNER Victor wrote:
> 
> STINNER Victor <vstinner@redhat.com> added the comment:
> 
> > From my perspective, the main problem with using type annotations is that there's nothing checking them in CI.
> 
> Even if unchecked, type annotations can serve as builtin documentation, 
> as docstrings (even when docstrings are not checked ;-)).

Yes, but no one has the expectation that docstrings are automatically verified in any way. :)
History
Date User Action Args
2019-08-15 01:24:14benjamin.petersonsetrecipients: + benjamin.peterson, lemburg, vstinner, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka, Greg Price, miss-islington
2019-08-15 01:24:14benjamin.petersonlinkissue37760 messages
2019-08-15 01:24:13benjamin.petersoncreate