This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author nemeskeyd
Recipients Lorenzo Persichetti, docs@python, nemeskeyd, pablogsal, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2019-08-07.09:00:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1565168458.62.0.854655737827.issue35786@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
Nothing in the documentation says that multiprocessing.Value and the object returned by manager.Value() is any different. Nor is it clear why they should be.

It is perfectly understandable to expect that manager.Value() is actually of type multiprocessing.Value. It is also a valid assumption that the "canonical" way to acquire such objects are from a Manager, not directly. An example that reinforces this assumption is that of the Queue class, which HAS to be created through a Manager, lest we get "RuntimeError: Queue objects should only be shared between processes through inheritance".

In conclusion, I think this is definitely a valid issue. What I am not so sure about is if it is (just) an issue in the documentation or the API itself.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-08-07 09:00:58nemeskeydsetrecipients: + nemeskeyd, paul.moore, tim.golden, docs@python, zach.ware, steve.dower, pablogsal, Lorenzo Persichetti
2019-08-07 09:00:58nemeskeydsetmessageid: <1565168458.62.0.854655737827.issue35786@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-08-07 09:00:58nemeskeydlinkissue35786 messages
2019-08-07 09:00:58nemeskeydcreate