Thank you Carol for your comment! Regarding your proposal, I find it it attractive as a compromise in order to make more gentle the introduction of the feature to users. I really appreciate the effort to balance all the different aspects and concerns.

Ccould you extend your thoughts regarding this concern that I have with respect of not including the trailing / in 3.8 but doing it in 3.9:

>I think documenting the trailing "/" is especially important because now users will find very confusing the fact that functions
only document the "/" in some places. They may start to believe that a trailing "/" is illegal syntax or that the "/" at the end
is optional. This will lead to even more confusion IMHO.

Another minor concern that I have is the fear that we will have a similar discussion in the future when the PR adding the trailing / to 3.9 would be added.