Message343740
> If you want to limit to 16-20 that may be ok but `cpu_count + 4` doesn't work in this case. On cloud servers, I see 128 or even more cores very often. 160+4 is not that you want to propose, sure.
I proposed cpu_count + 4 because #24882 almost fixed the problem of large maxworks.
If you don't like it, how about min(32, cpu_count+4)?
> I insist on changing the default calculation schema in concurrent.futures, not in asyncio. There is no case for asyncio to be exceptional.
Makes sense. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-05-28 07:17:02 | methane | set | recipients:
+ methane, asvetlov, yselivanov, Vojtěch Boček, Epic_Wink |
2019-05-28 07:17:02 | methane | set | messageid: <1559027822.05.0.477677233767.issue35279@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
2019-05-28 07:17:02 | methane | link | issue35279 messages |
2019-05-28 07:17:01 | methane | create | |
|