Author mjsaah
Recipients belopolsky, eric.smith, matrixise, miss-islington, mjsaah, p-ganssle, pablogsal, terry.reedy, thatiparthy, vstinner, xdegaye, xtreak
Date 2019-03-18.12:45:42
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAAGJmtTBgz09yvdFqvA_Jz9exnucFvhOiqp25=ebLT2LZw9M_Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1552910266.77.0.360373810079.issue35066@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content
While I agree with Victor that reworking time.strftime to be more portable
is a great idea, this issue was never about that; it was about making
exception throwing behavior consistent across datetime's two strftime
implementations (python and C), and also bringing them into line with what
time.strftime does.

Xavier's bug shows that my test methodology didn't take into account the
range of libc strftime behavior. The patch proposed makes sense to me.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-03-18 12:45:42mjsaahsetrecipients: + mjsaah, terry.reedy, belopolsky, vstinner, eric.smith, xdegaye, matrixise, thatiparthy, p-ganssle, pablogsal, miss-islington, xtreak
2019-03-18 12:45:42mjsaahlinkissue35066 messages
2019-03-18 12:45:42mjsaahcreate