Message 336631 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	brandtbucher
Recipients	brandtbucher, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2019-02-26.08:30:04
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1551169805.02.0.288011089975.issue36117@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
I don't really see, though, how comparing complex(42) == float(42) is any less dangerous than complex(42) <= float(42). It seems odd to me, personally, that real-valued complex objects are valid for some rich comparisons (but not others) when the math is unambiguous.

I don't really see, though, how comparing complex(42) == float(42) is any less dangerous than complex(42) <= float(42). It seems odd to me, personally, that real-valued complex objects are valid for *some* rich comparisons (but not others) when the math is unambiguous.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-02-26 08:30:05	brandtbucher	set	recipients: + brandtbucher, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka
2019-02-26 08:30:05	brandtbucher	set	messageid: <1551169805.02.0.288011089975.issue36117@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-02-26 08:30:05	brandtbucher	link	issue36117 messages
2019-02-26 08:30:04	brandtbucher	create