Author mark.dickinson
Recipients FR4NKESTI3N, josh.r, jwilk, kellerfuchs, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters
Date 2019-02-24.10:51:02
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1551005462.63.0.888638020107.issue35431@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Can I get a consensus on weather math.perm() is needed?

It's not, for the purposes of this issue. I think `math.perm` should be the subject of a separate issue and discussion, and a separate PR. That way it doesn't block completion of this issue.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-02-24 10:51:02mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, rhettinger, jwilk, steven.daprano, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r, kellerfuchs, FR4NKESTI3N
2019-02-24 10:51:02mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1551005462.63.0.888638020107.issue35431@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-02-24 10:51:02mark.dickinsonlinkissue35431 messages
2019-02-24 10:51:02mark.dickinsoncreate