Author rhettinger
Recipients FR4NKESTI3N, josh.r, kellerfuchs, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters
Date 2019-01-29.01:46:42
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1548726402.8.0.700553282561.issue35431@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> But given the precedent set by itertools and math.factorial,
> perhaps you are right and we ought to stick to the longer name

I disagree.  Let's stick with comb() which is what SciPy uses.  It is tedious to write out combinations in a formula what includes other steps. Also, I really want to differentiate it from the existing combinations() in the itertools module (it is reasonably forseeable that the two will used together.
History
Date User Action Args
2019-01-29 01:46:44rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r, kellerfuchs, FR4NKESTI3N
2019-01-29 01:46:42rhettingersetmessageid: <1548726402.8.0.700553282561.issue35431@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-01-29 01:46:42rhettingerlinkissue35431 messages
2019-01-29 01:46:42rhettingercreate