Message333049
I searched harder. :-)
https://bugs.python.org/issue29871
I see that someone else already noticed this broken function, but I guess
it was left broken because of other issues with using condition variables
instead of the emulated ones?
Still, the code is wrong as written...
Jeff
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019, 1:11 AM Steve Dower <report@bugs.python.org wrote:
>
> Steve Dower <steve.dower@python.org> added the comment:
>
> There's an existing issue for this somewhere - we've tried a couple times
> to switch over and run into various issues. I'm not in a place to find it
> right now, but worth looking.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35662>
> _______________________________________
> |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2019-01-05 08:46:49 | jeffr@livedata.com | set | recipients:
+ jeffr@livedata.com, paul.moore, tim.golden, zach.ware, steve.dower |
2019-01-05 08:46:48 | jeffr@livedata.com | link | issue35662 messages |
2019-01-05 08:46:48 | jeffr@livedata.com | create | |
|