Author vstinner
Recipients ZackerySpytz, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2018-11-29.10:57:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1543489074.99.0.788709270274.issue35337@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> This is compatibility breaking change.

Right. The question is if you are ok with it :-)

> Currently you can get the address of the array of tuple items by using &PyTuple_GET_ITEM(obj, 0).

I don't get your point. I know that you access directly obj->ob_item to use directly the C array rather than PyTuple_GET_ITEM/PyTuple_SET_ITEM, but the issue is about making PyTuple_GET_ITEM/PyTuple_SET_ITEM stricter in debug mode.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-11-29 10:57:55vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, serhiy.storchaka, ZackerySpytz
2018-11-29 10:57:54vstinnersetmessageid: <1543489074.99.0.788709270274.issue35337@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-11-29 10:57:54vstinnerlinkissue35337 messages
2018-11-29 10:57:54vstinnercreate